GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FR772424vsCoraxisFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

772424
WPTR Score7413 ms
Rank#842
TTFB1034ms
Time to 1MB2728ms
Score7413
LCP1434ms
FCP1234ms
Coraxis
WPTR ScoreWinner4486 ms
Rank#517
TTFB156ms
Time to 1MB718ms
Score4486
LCP556ms
FCP356ms

Our Verdict

Coraxis wins with 156ms TTFB (vs 772424's 1034ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

Phase772424CoraxisWinner
DNS Lookup2ms2535ms772424
TCP Connection15ms89ms772424
TLS Handshake18ms82ms772424
Server Processing831ms57msCoraxis
Total TTFB866ms2763msCoraxis

Technology & Security Features

772424

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size1095.0 KB

Coraxis

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size109.0 KB
3/3
772424 Security Features
1/3
Coraxis Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.