GitHub|Since 2007

FR772424vsNameshieldFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score7413 ms
Rank#842
TTFB1034ms
Time to 1MB2728ms
Score7413
LCP1434ms
FCP1234ms
WPTR ScoreWinner2372 ms
Rank#576
TTFB805ms
Time to 1MB583ms
Score2372
LCP1205ms
FCP1005ms

Our Verdict

Nameshield wins with 805ms TTFB (vs 772424's 1034ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

Phase772424NameshieldWinner
DNS Lookup2ms103ms772424
TCP Connection15ms59ms772424
TLS Handshake18ms69ms772424
Server Processing831ms742msNameshield
Total TTFB866ms973msNameshield

Technology & Security Features

772424

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size1095.0 KB

Nameshield

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size218.3 KB
3/3
772424 Security Features
1/3
Nameshield Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.