AcribvsIwit Systems
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Acrib
View Details →
Iwit Systems
View Details →Our Verdict
Iwit Systems wins with 228ms TTFB (vs Acrib's 241ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Acrib | Iwit Systems | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 479ms | 106ms | Iwit Systems |
| TCP Connection | 84ms | 53ms | Iwit Systems |
| TLS Handshake | 115ms | 52ms | Iwit Systems |
| Server Processing | 65ms | 75ms | Acrib |
| Total TTFB | 743ms | 286ms | Iwit Systems |
Technology & Security Features
Acrib
Iwit Systems
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.