GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRAcribvsJalisFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Acrib
WPTR Score1847 ms
Rank#386
TTFB241ms
Time to 1MB460ms
Score1847
LCP641ms
FCP441ms
Jalis
WPTR ScoreWinner991 ms
Rank#125
TTFB353ms
Time to 1MB103ms
Score991
LCP753ms
FCP553ms

Our Verdict

Acrib wins with 241ms TTFB (vs Jalis's 353ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAcribJalisWinner
DNS Lookup479ms247msJalis
TCP Connection84ms207msAcrib
TLS Handshake115ms48msJalis
Server Processing65ms242msAcrib
Total TTFB743ms744msAcrib

Technology & Security Features

Acrib

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size19.5 KB

Jalis

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size133.6 KB
1/3
Acrib Security Features
0/3
Jalis Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.