GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRAcribvsMindflurryFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Acrib
WPTR ScoreWinner1716 ms
Rank#404
TTFB236ms
Time to 1MB460ms
Score1716
LCP636ms
FCP436ms
Mindflurry
WPTR Score3717 ms
Rank#723
TTFB2811ms
Time to 1MB161ms
Score3717
LCP3211ms
FCP3011ms

Our Verdict

Acrib wins with 236ms TTFB (vs Mindflurry's 2811ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAcribMindflurryWinner
DNS Lookup375ms137msMindflurry
TCP Connection58ms40msMindflurry
TLS Handshake114ms42msMindflurry
Server Processing65ms3112msAcrib
Total TTFB612ms3331msAcrib

Technology & Security Features

Acrib

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size19.5 KB

Mindflurry

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size595.1 KB
1/3
Acrib Security Features
1/3
Mindflurry Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.