GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRAcribvso2switchFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Acrib
WPTR Score1716 ms
Rank#404
TTFB236ms
Time to 1MB460ms
Score1716
LCP636ms
FCP436ms
o2switch
WPTR ScoreWinner1221 ms
Rank#246
TTFB513ms
Time to 1MB159ms
Score1221
LCP913ms
FCP713ms

Our Verdict

Acrib wins with 236ms TTFB (vs o2switch's 513ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAcribo2switchWinner
DNS Lookup375ms615msAcrib
TCP Connection58ms59msAcrib
TLS Handshake114ms59mso2switch
Server Processing65ms106msAcrib
Total TTFB612ms839msAcrib

Technology & Security Features

Acrib

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size19.5 KB

o2switch

Server/CDNo2switch
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size342.5 KB
1/3
Acrib Security Features
1/3
o2switch Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.