GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRAcribvsTelelecFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Acrib
WPTR Score1847 ms
Rank#386
TTFB241ms
Time to 1MB460ms
Score1847
LCP641ms
FCP441ms
Telelec
WPTR ScoreWinner909 ms
Rank#122
TTFB314ms
Time to 1MB118ms
Score909
LCP714ms
FCP514ms

Our Verdict

Acrib wins with 241ms TTFB (vs Telelec's 314ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAcribTelelecWinner
DNS Lookup479ms282msTelelec
TCP Connection84ms122msAcrib
TLS Handshake115ms81msTelelec
Server Processing65ms141msAcrib
Total TTFB743ms626msAcrib

Technology & Security Features

Acrib

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size19.5 KB

Telelec

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size123.7 KB
1/3
Acrib Security Features
1/3
Telelec Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.