active-serversvsLinevast
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

active-servers
View Details →
Linevast
View Details →Our Verdict
active-servers wins with 130ms TTFB (vs Linevast's 214ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | active-servers | Linevast | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 155ms | 25ms | Linevast |
| TCP Connection | 154ms | 87ms | Linevast |
| TLS Handshake | 48ms | 66ms | active-servers |
| Server Processing | 42ms | 59ms | active-servers |
| Total TTFB | 399ms | 237ms | active-servers |
Technology & Security Features
active-servers
Linevast
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.