Adacor HostingvsZAP-Hosting
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Adacor Hosting
View Details →
ZAP-Hosting
View Details →Our Verdict
ZAP-Hosting wins with 648ms TTFB (vs Adacor Hosting's 705ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Adacor Hosting | ZAP-Hosting | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 223ms | 1ms | ZAP-Hosting |
| TCP Connection | 66ms | 11ms | ZAP-Hosting |
| TLS Handshake | 46ms | 15ms | ZAP-Hosting |
| Server Processing | 586ms | 882ms | Adacor Hosting |
| Total TTFB | 921ms | 909ms | ZAP-Hosting |
Technology & Security Features
Adacor Hosting
ZAP-Hosting
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.