GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRAdistavsAveliaFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Adista
WPTR ScoreWinner850 ms
Rank#142
TTFB222ms
Time to 1MB183ms
Score850
LCP622ms
FCP422ms
Avelia
WPTR Score922 ms
Rank#184
TTFB490ms
Time to 1MB118ms
Score922
LCP890ms
FCP690ms

Our Verdict

Adista wins with 222ms TTFB (vs Avelia's 490ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAdistaAveliaWinner
DNS Lookup161ms134msAvelia
TCP Connection61ms185msAdista
TLS Handshake72ms60msAvelia
Server Processing117ms260msAdista
Total TTFB411ms639msAdista

Technology & Security Features

Adista

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size0.1 KB

Avelia

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size98.6 KB
0/3
Adista Security Features
1/3
Avelia Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.