GitHub|Since 2007

FRAdistavsNameshieldFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner850 ms
Rank#142
TTFB222ms
Time to 1MB183ms
Score850
LCP622ms
FCP422ms
WPTR Score2372 ms
Rank#576
TTFB805ms
Time to 1MB583ms
Score2372
LCP1205ms
FCP1005ms

Our Verdict

Adista wins with 222ms TTFB (vs Nameshield's 805ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAdistaNameshieldWinner
DNS Lookup161ms103msNameshield
TCP Connection61ms59msNameshield
TLS Handshake72ms69msNameshield
Server Processing117ms742msAdista
Total TTFB411ms973msAdista

Technology & Security Features

Adista

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size0.1 KB

Nameshield

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size218.3 KB
0/3
Adista Security Features
1/3
Nameshield Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.