GitHub|Since 2007

ruAdminVPSvsFullSpaceru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2347 ms
Rank#577
TTFB303ms
Time to 1MB762ms
Score2347
LCP703ms
FCP503ms
WPTR Score2578 ms
Rank#629
TTFB407ms
Time to 1MB839ms
Score2578
LCP807ms
FCP607ms

Our Verdict

AdminVPS wins with 303ms TTFB (vs FullSpace's 407ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAdminVPSFullSpaceWinner
DNS Lookup9ms129msAdminVPS
TCP Connection224ms82msFullSpace
TLS Handshake70ms164msAdminVPS
Server Processing215ms189msFullSpace
Total TTFB518ms564msAdminVPS

Technology & Security Features

AdminVPS

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size227.4 KB

FullSpace

Server/CDNopenresty
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size5.3 KB
1/3
AdminVPS Security Features
0/3
FullSpace Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.