Alfa-SafetyvsCoraxis
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Alfa-Safety
View Details →
Coraxis
View Details →Our Verdict
Coraxis wins with 156ms TTFB (vs Alfa-Safety's 168ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Alfa-Safety | Coraxis | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 377ms | 2535ms | Alfa-Safety |
| TCP Connection | 168ms | 89ms | Coraxis |
| TLS Handshake | 51ms | 82ms | Alfa-Safety |
| Server Processing | 68ms | 57ms | Coraxis |
| Total TTFB | 664ms | 2763ms | Coraxis |
Technology & Security Features
Alfa-Safety
Coraxis
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.