AlfahostingvsCancom
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Alfahosting
View Details →
Cancom
View Details →Our Verdict
Cancom wins with 349ms TTFB (vs Alfahosting's 2074ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Alfahosting | Cancom | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 146ms | 72ms | Cancom |
| TCP Connection | 65ms | 124ms | Alfahosting |
| TLS Handshake | 134ms | 65ms | Cancom |
| Server Processing | 1864ms | 164ms | Cancom |
| Total TTFB | 2209ms | 425ms | Cancom |
Technology & Security Features
Alfahosting
Cancom
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.