GitHub|Since 2007

FRAlsace WebvsDigoraFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score2466 ms
Rank#615
TTFB59ms
Time to 1MB993ms
Score2466
LCP459ms
FCP259ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1818 ms
Rank#574
TTFB526ms
Time to 1MB695ms
Score1818
LCP926ms
FCP726ms

Our Verdict

Alsace Web wins with 59ms TTFB (vs Digora's 526ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAlsace WebDigoraWinner
DNS Lookup19ms1msDigora
TCP Connection12ms43msAlsace Web
TLS Handshake17ms45msAlsace Web
Server Processing35ms61msAlsace Web
Total TTFB83ms150msAlsace Web

Technology & Security Features

Alsace Web

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.4 KB

Digora

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size198.0 KB
2/3
Alsace Web Security Features
0/3
Digora Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.