GitHub|Since 2007

FRAlsace WebvsFoliateamFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score2466 ms
Rank#615
TTFB59ms
Time to 1MB993ms
Score2466
LCP459ms
FCP259ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1615 ms
Rank#385
TTFB247ms
Time to 1MB456ms
Score1615
LCP647ms
FCP447ms

Our Verdict

Alsace Web wins with 59ms TTFB (vs Foliateam's 247ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAlsace WebFoliateamWinner
DNS Lookup19ms286msAlsace Web
TCP Connection12ms78msAlsace Web
TLS Handshake17ms42msAlsace Web
Server Processing35ms115msAlsace Web
Total TTFB83ms521msAlsace Web

Technology & Security Features

Alsace Web

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.4 KB

Foliateam

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size230.7 KB
2/3
Alsace Web Security Features
3/3
Foliateam Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.