GitHub|Since 2007

FRAlsace WebvsOVHcloudFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score2453 ms
Rank#653
TTFB53ms
Time to 1MB993ms
Score2453
LCP453ms
FCP253ms
WPTR ScoreWinner574 ms
Rank#310
TTFB702ms
Time to 1MB152ms
Score574
LCP1102ms
FCP902ms

Our Verdict

Alsace Web wins with 53ms TTFB (vs OVHcloud's 702ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAlsace WebOVHcloudWinner
DNS Lookup18ms5msOVHcloud
TCP Connection14ms65msAlsace Web
TLS Handshake17ms73msAlsace Web
Server Processing21ms66msAlsace Web
Total TTFB70ms209msAlsace Web

Technology & Security Features

Alsace Web

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.4 KB

OVHcloud

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size590.5 KB
2/3
Alsace Web Security Features
1/3
OVHcloud Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.