Amazon Web Services (AWS)vsCyrusOne
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
View Details →
CyrusOne
View Details →Our Verdict
CyrusOne wins with 138ms TTFB (vs Amazon Web Services (AWS)'s 252ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | CyrusOne | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 5ms | 107ms | Amazon Web Services (AWS) |
| TCP Connection | 48ms | 5ms | CyrusOne |
| TLS Handshake | 50ms | 11ms | CyrusOne |
| Server Processing | 159ms | 73ms | CyrusOne |
| Total TTFB | 262ms | 196ms | CyrusOne |
Technology & Security Features
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
CyrusOne
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.