GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRAMENvsOodriveFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

AMEN
WPTR Score1576 ms
Rank#417
TTFB203ms
Time to 1MB522ms
Score1576
LCP603ms
FCP403ms
Oodrive
WPTR ScoreWinner1009 ms
Rank#156
TTFB173ms
Time to 1MB221ms
Score1009
LCP573ms
FCP373ms

Our Verdict

Oodrive wins with 173ms TTFB (vs AMEN's 203ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAMENOodriveWinner
DNS Lookup44ms316msAMEN
TCP Connection131ms47msOodrive
TLS Handshake98ms49msOodrive
Server Processing50ms67msAMEN
Total TTFB323ms479msOodrive

Technology & Security Features

AMEN

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size145.6 KB

Oodrive

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size1270.3 KB
1/3
AMEN Security Features
1/3
Oodrive Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.