GitHub|Since 2007

DEArtfiles New MediavswebhostoneDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Artfiles New Media

Artfiles New Media

View Details
WPTR Score3340 ms
Rank#744
TTFB187ms
Time to 1MB1286ms
Score3340
LCP587ms
FCP387ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1175 ms
Rank#278
TTFB462ms
Time to 1MB214ms
Score1175
LCP862ms
FCP662ms

Our Verdict

Artfiles New Media wins with 187ms TTFB (vs webhostone's 462ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseArtfiles New MediawebhostoneWinner
DNS Lookup92ms247msArtfiles New Media
TCP Connection52ms265msArtfiles New Media
TLS Handshake55ms52mswebhostone
Server Processing55ms97msArtfiles New Media
Total TTFB254ms661msArtfiles New Media

Technology & Security Features

Artfiles New Media

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size80.2 KB

webhostone

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size626.1 KB
1/3
Artfiles New Media Security Features
1/3
webhostone Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.