GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRATEvsNBS SystemFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

ATE
WPTR Score4087 ms
Rank#772
TTFB614ms
Time to 1MB1498ms
Score4087
LCP1014ms
FCP814ms
NBS System
WPTR ScoreWinner1002 ms
Rank#244
TTFB320ms
Time to 1MB251ms
Score1002
LCP720ms
FCP520ms

Our Verdict

NBS System wins with 320ms TTFB (vs ATE's 614ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseATENBS SystemWinner
DNS Lookup125ms100msNBS System
TCP Connection189ms149msNBS System
TLS Handshake75ms57msNBS System
Server Processing103ms94msNBS System
Total TTFB492ms400msNBS System

Technology & Security Features

ATE

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size300.4 KB

NBS System

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size642.6 KB
2/3
ATE Security Features
1/3
NBS System Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.