GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRAveliavsVadeFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Avelia
WPTR Score922 ms
Rank#184
TTFB490ms
Time to 1MB118ms
Score922
LCP890ms
FCP690ms
Vade
WPTR ScoreWinner606 ms
Rank#105
TTFB278ms
Time to 1MB113ms
Score606
LCP678ms
FCP478ms

Our Verdict

Vade wins with 278ms TTFB (vs Avelia's 490ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAveliaVadeWinner
DNS Lookup134ms1msVade
TCP Connection185ms5msVade
TLS Handshake60ms9msVade
Server Processing260ms320msAvelia
Total TTFB639ms335msVade

Technology & Security Features

Avelia

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size98.6 KB

Vade

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size375.3 KB
1/3
Avelia Security Features
3/3
Vade Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.