AWSvsPorkbun
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Porkbun
View Details →Our Verdict
AWS wins with 214ms TTFB (vs Porkbun's 1136ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | AWS | Porkbun | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 5ms | 36ms | AWS |
| TCP Connection | 46ms | 201ms | AWS |
| TLS Handshake | 47ms | 402ms | AWS |
| Server Processing | 381ms | 526ms | AWS |
| Total TTFB | 479ms | 1165ms | AWS |
Technology & Security Features
AWS
Porkbun
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.
