GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

DEAxiansvsBioHostDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Axians
WPTR ScoreWinner984 ms
Rank#209
TTFB407ms
Time to 1MB175ms
Score984
LCP807ms
FCP607ms
BioHost
WPTR Score1300 ms
Rank#425
TTFB619ms
Time to 1MB311ms
Score1300
LCP1019ms
FCP819ms

Our Verdict

Axians wins with 407ms TTFB (vs BioHost's 619ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAxiansBioHostWinner
DNS Lookup341ms133msBioHost
TCP Connection86ms50msBioHost
TLS Handshake49ms69msAxians
Server Processing88ms302msAxians
Total TTFB564ms554msAxians

Technology & Security Features

Axians

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size1366.5 KB

BioHost

Server/CDNApache/2.4.46 (Ubunt
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size39.0 KB
1/3
Axians Security Features
1/3
BioHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.