GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

DEAxiansvsBitPointDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Axians
WPTR Score984 ms
Rank#209
TTFB407ms
Time to 1MB175ms
Score984
LCP807ms
FCP607ms
BitPoint
WPTR ScoreWinner800 ms
Rank#355
TTFB593ms
Time to 1MB243ms
Score800
LCP993ms
FCP793ms

Our Verdict

Axians wins with 407ms TTFB (vs BitPoint's 593ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAxiansBitPointWinner
DNS Lookup341ms53msBitPoint
TCP Connection86ms40msBitPoint
TLS Handshake49ms38msBitPoint
Server Processing88ms86msBitPoint
Total TTFB564ms217msAxians

Technology & Security Features

Axians

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size1366.5 KB

BitPoint

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size55.9 KB
1/3
Axians Security Features
1/3
BitPoint Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.