Bechtle CloudsvsenerSpace
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Bechtle Clouds
View Details →
enerSpace
View Details →Our Verdict
enerSpace wins with 222ms TTFB (vs Bechtle Clouds's 448ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Bechtle Clouds | enerSpace | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 109ms | 152ms | Bechtle Clouds |
| TCP Connection | 83ms | 56ms | enerSpace |
| TLS Handshake | 49ms | 58ms | Bechtle Clouds |
| Server Processing | 357ms | 105ms | enerSpace |
| Total TTFB | 598ms | 371ms | enerSpace |
Technology & Security Features
Bechtle Clouds
enerSpace
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.