GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruBegetvsCaravanru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Beget
WPTR Score1445 ms
Rank#488
TTFB684ms
Time to 1MB412ms
Score1445
LCP1084ms
FCP884ms
Caravan
WPTR ScoreWinner1382 ms
Rank#379
TTFB240ms
Time to 1MB415ms
Score1382
LCP640ms
FCP440ms

Our Verdict

Caravan wins with 240ms TTFB (vs Beget's 684ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBegetCaravanWinner
DNS Lookup4ms73msBeget
TCP Connection109ms151msBeget
TLS Handshake107ms84msCaravan
Server Processing236ms78msCaravan
Total TTFB456ms386msCaravan

Technology & Security Features

Beget

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size0.3 KB

Caravan

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size26.0 KB
1/3
Beget Security Features
0/3
Caravan Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.