GitHub|Since 2007

ruBegetvsCloud4boxru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1445 ms
Rank#488
TTFB684ms
Time to 1MB412ms
Score1445
LCP1084ms
FCP884ms
WPTR Score2199 ms
Rank#594
TTFB546ms
Time to 1MB700ms
Score2199
LCP946ms
FCP746ms

Our Verdict

Cloud4box wins with 546ms TTFB (vs Beget's 684ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBegetCloud4boxWinner
DNS Lookup4ms5msBeget
TCP Connection109ms81msCloud4box
TLS Handshake107ms86msCloud4box
Server Processing236ms347msBeget
Total TTFB456ms519msCloud4box

Technology & Security Features

Beget

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size0.3 KB

Cloud4box

Server/CDNnginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size186.0 KB
1/3
Beget Security Features
0/3
Cloud4box Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.