GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruBegetvsFullSpaceru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Beget
WPTR ScoreWinner1445 ms
Rank#488
TTFB684ms
Time to 1MB412ms
Score1445
LCP1084ms
FCP884ms
FullSpace
WPTR Score2578 ms
Rank#629
TTFB407ms
Time to 1MB839ms
Score2578
LCP807ms
FCP607ms

Our Verdict

FullSpace wins with 407ms TTFB (vs Beget's 684ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBegetFullSpaceWinner
DNS Lookup4ms129msBeget
TCP Connection109ms82msFullSpace
TLS Handshake107ms164msBeget
Server Processing236ms189msFullSpace
Total TTFB456ms564msFullSpace

Technology & Security Features

Beget

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size0.3 KB

FullSpace

Server/CDNopenresty
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size5.3 KB
1/3
Beget Security Features
0/3
FullSpace Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.