BegetvsHTS (Hosting Telesystems)
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Beget
View Details →
HTS (Hosting Telesystems)
View Details →Our Verdict
Beget wins with 684ms TTFB (vs HTS (Hosting Telesystems)'s 1070ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Beget | HTS (Hosting Telesystems) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 4ms | 83ms | Beget |
| TCP Connection | 109ms | 256ms | Beget |
| TLS Handshake | 107ms | 66ms | HTS (Hosting Telesystems) |
| Server Processing | 236ms | 875ms | Beget |
| Total TTFB | 456ms | 1280ms | Beget |
Technology & Security Features
Beget
HTS (Hosting Telesystems)
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.