GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruBegetvsReg.ruRU

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Beget
WPTR Score1607 ms
Rank#520
TTFB704ms
Time to 1MB427ms
Score1607
LCP1104ms
FCP904ms
Reg.ru
WPTR ScoreWinner1040 ms
Rank#503
TTFB908ms
Time to 1MB318ms
Score1040
LCP1308ms
FCP1108ms

Our Verdict

Beget wins with 704ms TTFB (vs Reg.ru's 908ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBegetReg.ruWinner
DNS Lookup95ms5msReg.ru
TCP Connection191ms117msReg.ru
TLS Handshake102ms82msReg.ru
Server Processing194ms73msReg.ru
Total TTFB582ms277msBeget

Technology & Security Features

Beget

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size0.3 KB

Reg.ru

Server/CDNsw
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size13.2 KB
1/3
Beget Security Features
1/3
Reg.ru Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.