GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruBegetvsTimewebru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Beget
WPTR Score1607 ms
Rank#520
TTFB704ms
Time to 1MB427ms
Score1607
LCP1104ms
FCP904ms
Timeweb
WPTR ScoreWinner1077 ms
Rank#342
TTFB442ms
Time to 1MB291ms
Score1077
LCP842ms
FCP642ms

Our Verdict

Timeweb wins with 442ms TTFB (vs Beget's 704ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBegetTimewebWinner
DNS Lookup95ms71msTimeweb
TCP Connection191ms46msTimeweb
TLS Handshake102ms44msTimeweb
Server Processing194ms218msBeget
Total TTFB582ms379msTimeweb

Technology & Security Features

Beget

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size0.3 KB

Timeweb

Server/CDNQRATOR
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size395.8 KB
1/3
Beget Security Features
1/3
Timeweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.