GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRBekkyvsEEnovFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Bekky
WPTR ScoreWinner1326 ms
Rank#348
TTFB182ms
Time to 1MB432ms
Score1326
LCP582ms
FCP382ms
EEnov
WPTR Score1404 ms
Rank#359
TTFB339ms
Time to 1MB382ms
Score1404
LCP739ms
FCP539ms

Our Verdict

Bekky wins with 182ms TTFB (vs EEnov's 339ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBekkyEEnovWinner
DNS Lookup101ms124msBekky
TCP Connection42ms64msBekky
TLS Handshake49ms64msBekky
Server Processing97ms235msBekky
Total TTFB289ms487msBekky

Technology & Security Features

Bekky

Server/CDNhcdn
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size225.6 KB

EEnov

Server/CDNApache/2.4.52 (Ubunt
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size507.2 KB
2/3
Bekky Security Features
1/3
EEnov Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.