GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

USBigScootsvsNOCIXUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

BigScoots
WPTR ScoreWinner355 ms
Rank#31
TTFB76ms
Time to 1MB125ms
Score355
LCP476ms
FCP276ms
NOCIX
WPTR Score2513 ms
Rank#657
TTFB61ms
Time to 1MB993ms
Score2513
LCP461ms
FCP261ms

Our Verdict

NOCIX wins with 61ms TTFB (vs BigScoots's 76ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBigScootsNOCIXWinner
DNS Lookup11ms61msBigScoots
TCP Connection13ms16msBigScoots
TLS Handshake12ms23msBigScoots
Server Processing19ms30msBigScoots
Total TTFB55ms130msNOCIX

Technology & Security Features

BigScoots

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size278.1 KB

NOCIX

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size9.4 KB
2/3
BigScoots Security Features
1/3
NOCIX Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.