GitHub|Since 2007

USBigScootsvsNtiretyUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner355 ms
Rank#31
TTFB76ms
Time to 1MB125ms
Score355
LCP476ms
FCP276ms
WPTR Score1785 ms
Rank#760
TTFB3273ms
Time to 1MB140ms
Score1785
LCP3673ms
FCP3473ms

Our Verdict

BigScoots wins with 76ms TTFB (vs Ntirety's 3273ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBigScootsNtiretyWinner
DNS Lookup11ms319msBigScoots
TCP Connection13ms279msBigScoots
TLS Handshake12ms212msBigScoots
Server Processing19ms639msBigScoots
Total TTFB55ms1449msBigScoots

Technology & Security Features

BigScoots

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size278.1 KB

Ntirety

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size89.3 KB
2/3
BigScoots Security Features
1/3
Ntirety Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.