BioHostvsI.T.E.N.O.S.
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

BioHost
View Details →
I.T.E.N.O.S.
View Details →Our Verdict
BioHost wins with 619ms TTFB (vs I.T.E.N.O.S.'s 1517ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | BioHost | I.T.E.N.O.S. | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 133ms | 102ms | I.T.E.N.O.S. |
| TCP Connection | 50ms | 154ms | BioHost |
| TLS Handshake | 69ms | 116ms | BioHost |
| Server Processing | 302ms | 975ms | BioHost |
| Total TTFB | 554ms | 1347ms | BioHost |
Technology & Security Features
BioHost
I.T.E.N.O.S.
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.