BioHostvslima-city
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

BioHost
View Details →
lima-city
View Details →Our Verdict
lima-city wins with 157ms TTFB (vs BioHost's 619ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | BioHost | lima-city | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 133ms | 8ms | lima-city |
| TCP Connection | 50ms | 53ms | BioHost |
| TLS Handshake | 69ms | 55ms | lima-city |
| Server Processing | 302ms | 102ms | lima-city |
| Total TTFB | 554ms | 218ms | lima-city |
Technology & Security Features
BioHost
lima-city
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.