GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

DEBitPointvsGreenstaDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

BitPoint
WPTR ScoreWinner800 ms
Rank#355
TTFB593ms
Time to 1MB243ms
Score800
LCP993ms
FCP793ms
Greensta
WPTR Score1182 ms
Rank#377
TTFB378ms
Time to 1MB358ms
Score1182
LCP778ms
FCP578ms

Our Verdict

Greensta wins with 378ms TTFB (vs BitPoint's 593ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBitPointGreenstaWinner
DNS Lookup53ms133msBitPoint
TCP Connection40ms59msBitPoint
TLS Handshake38ms61msBitPoint
Server Processing86ms70msGreensta
Total TTFB217ms323msGreensta

Technology & Security Features

BitPoint

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size55.9 KB

Greensta

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size372.9 KB
1/3
BitPoint Security Features
1/3
Greensta Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.