BluehostvsColoCrossing
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Bluehost
View Details →
ColoCrossing
View Details →Our Verdict
Bluehost wins with 113ms TTFB (vs ColoCrossing's 1384ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Bluehost | ColoCrossing | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 8ms | 57ms | Bluehost |
| TCP Connection | 8ms | 139ms | Bluehost |
| TLS Handshake | 8ms | 133ms | Bluehost |
| Server Processing | 98ms | 145ms | Bluehost |
| Total TTFB | 122ms | 474ms | Bluehost |
Technology & Security Features
Bluehost
ColoCrossing
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.