BluehostvsPair Networks
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Bluehost
View Details →
Pair Networks
View Details →Our Verdict
Bluehost wins with 113ms TTFB (vs Pair Networks's 346ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Bluehost | Pair Networks | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 8ms | 128ms | Bluehost |
| TCP Connection | 8ms | 16ms | Bluehost |
| TLS Handshake | 8ms | 20ms | Bluehost |
| Server Processing | 98ms | 606ms | Bluehost |
| Total TTFB | 122ms | 770ms | Bluehost |
Technology & Security Features
Bluehost
Pair Networks
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.