GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

DECancomvswebgoDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Cancom
WPTR ScoreWinner790 ms
Rank#165
TTFB349ms
Time to 1MB152ms
Score790
LCP749ms
FCP549ms
webgo
WPTR Score865 ms
Rank#333
TTFB492ms
Time to 1MB258ms
Score865
LCP892ms
FCP692ms

Our Verdict

Cancom wins with 349ms TTFB (vs webgo's 492ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCancomwebgoWinner
DNS Lookup72ms49mswebgo
TCP Connection124ms47mswebgo
TLS Handshake65ms104msCancom
Server Processing164ms46mswebgo
Total TTFB425ms246msCancom

Technology & Security Features

Cancom

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size852.8 KB

webgo

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size499.5 KB
1/3
Cancom Security Features
0/3
webgo Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.