GitHub|Since 2007

DEcheckdomainvsgoneoDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

checkdomain

checkdomain

View Details
WPTR ScoreWinner748 ms
Rank#115
TTFB303ms
Time to 1MB104ms
Score748
LCP703ms
FCP503ms
WPTR Score1164 ms
Rank#324
TTFB167ms
Time to 1MB384ms
Score1164
LCP567ms
FCP367ms

Our Verdict

goneo wins with 167ms TTFB (vs checkdomain's 303ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhasecheckdomaingoneoWinner
DNS Lookup221ms82msgoneo
TCP Connection107ms43msgoneo
TLS Handshake60ms50msgoneo
Server Processing110ms67msgoneo
Total TTFB498ms242msgoneo

Technology & Security Features

checkdomain

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size198.5 KB

goneo

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size43.3 KB
1/3
checkdomain Security Features
0/3
goneo Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.