GitHub|Since 2007

USChemiCloudvsCoreSiteUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score1404 ms
Rank#370
TTFB973ms
Time to 1MB107ms
Score1404
LCP1373ms
FCP1173ms
WPTR ScoreWinner520 ms
Rank#50
TTFB134ms
Time to 1MB124ms
Score520
LCP534ms
FCP334ms

Our Verdict

CoreSite wins with 134ms TTFB (vs ChemiCloud's 973ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseChemiCloudCoreSiteWinner
DNS Lookup195ms129msCoreSite
TCP Connection7ms6msCoreSite
TLS Handshake11ms12msChemiCloud
Server Processing934ms75msCoreSite
Total TTFB1147ms222msCoreSite

Technology & Security Features

ChemiCloud

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size8.8 KB

CoreSite

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size201.7 KB
3/3
ChemiCloud Security Features
3/3
CoreSite Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.