Claranet GermanyvsNexon Asia Pacific

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 1/10/2026

Claranet Germany

View Details →

WPTR Score3161 ms

Rank#663

TTFB708ms

Time to 1MB1022ms

Score3161/100

LCP1108ms

FCP908ms

Nexon Asia Pacific

View Details →

WPTR ScoreWinner1761 ms

Rank#486

TTFB278ms

Time to 1MB618ms

Score1761/100

LCP678ms

FCP478ms

Our Verdict

Nexon Asia Pacific wins with 278ms TTFB (vs Claranet Germany's 708ms)

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: WPTR Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).

TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds

Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)

LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads

FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears

Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.