GitHub|Since 2007

ruCloud4boxvsJinoru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2199 ms
Rank#594
TTFB546ms
Time to 1MB700ms
Score2199
LCP946ms
FCP746ms
WPTR Score8882 ms
Rank#854
TTFB609ms
Time to 1MB3398ms
Score8882
LCP1009ms
FCP809ms

Our Verdict

Cloud4box wins with 546ms TTFB (vs Jino's 609ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCloud4boxJinoWinner
DNS Lookup5ms82msCloud4box
TCP Connection81ms268msCloud4box
TLS Handshake86ms124msCloud4box
Server Processing347ms253msJino
Total TTFB519ms727msCloud4box

Technology & Security Features

Cloud4box

Server/CDNnginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size186.0 KB

Jino

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size58.0 KB
0/3
Cloud4box Security Features
0/3
Jino Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.