GitHub|Since 2007

ruCloud4boxvsReg.ruRU

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score2270 ms
Rank#626
TTFB596ms
Time to 1MB715ms
Score2270
LCP996ms
FCP796ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1040 ms
Rank#503
TTFB908ms
Time to 1MB318ms
Score1040
LCP1308ms
FCP1108ms

Our Verdict

Cloud4box wins with 596ms TTFB (vs Reg.ru's 908ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCloud4boxReg.ruWinner
DNS Lookup6ms5msReg.ru
TCP Connection102ms117msCloud4box
TLS Handshake81ms82msCloud4box
Server Processing365ms73msReg.ru
Total TTFB554ms277msCloud4box

Technology & Security Features

Cloud4box

Server/CDNnginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size186.0 KB

Reg.ru

Server/CDNsw
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size13.2 KB
0/3
Cloud4box Security Features
1/3
Reg.ru Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.