GitHub|Since 2007

USCloudConevsFastCometUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score1449 ms
Rank#444
TTFB1174ms
Time to 1MB98ms
Score1449
LCP1574ms
FCP1374ms
WPTR ScoreWinner701 ms
Rank#76
TTFB53ms
Time to 1MB180ms
Score701
LCP453ms
FCP253ms

Our Verdict

FastComet wins with 53ms TTFB (vs CloudCone's 1174ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCloudConeFastCometWinner
DNS Lookup132ms63msFastComet
TCP Connection221ms14msFastComet
TLS Handshake187ms17msFastComet
Server Processing674ms175msFastComet
Total TTFB1214ms269msFastComet

Technology & Security Features

CloudCone

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size156.2 KB

FastComet

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size210.2 KB
1/3
CloudCone Security Features
1/3
FastComet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.