CloudConevsFastComet
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

CloudCone
View Details →FastComet
View Details →Our Verdict
FastComet wins with 53ms TTFB (vs CloudCone's 1174ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | CloudCone | FastComet | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 132ms | 63ms | FastComet |
| TCP Connection | 221ms | 14ms | FastComet |
| TLS Handshake | 187ms | 17ms | FastComet |
| Server Processing | 674ms | 175ms | FastComet |
| Total TTFB | 1214ms | 269ms | FastComet |
Technology & Security Features
CloudCone
FastComet
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.