CloudConevsInMotion Hosting
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

CloudCone
View Details →
InMotion Hosting
View Details →Our Verdict
InMotion Hosting wins with 701ms TTFB (vs CloudCone's 1174ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | CloudCone | InMotion Hosting | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 132ms | 125ms | InMotion Hosting |
| TCP Connection | 221ms | 6ms | InMotion Hosting |
| TLS Handshake | 187ms | 10ms | InMotion Hosting |
| Server Processing | 674ms | 220ms | InMotion Hosting |
| Total TTFB | 1214ms | 361ms | InMotion Hosting |
Technology & Security Features
CloudCone
InMotion Hosting
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.