CoderovsLiquid Web
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Codero
View Details →
Liquid Web
View Details →Our Verdict
Liquid Web wins with 44ms TTFB (vs Codero's 643ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Codero | Liquid Web | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 95ms | 42ms | Liquid Web |
| TCP Connection | 19ms | 5ms | Liquid Web |
| TLS Handshake | 22ms | 13ms | Liquid Web |
| Server Processing | 185ms | 83ms | Liquid Web |
| Total TTFB | 321ms | 143ms | Liquid Web |
Technology & Security Features
Codero
Liquid Web
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.