GitHub|Since 2007

USCoderovsLiquid WebUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner770 ms
Rank#325
TTFB643ms
Time to 1MB187ms
Score770
LCP1043ms
FCP843ms
WPTR Score1187 ms
Rank#323
TTFB44ms
Time to 1MB435ms
Score1187
LCP444ms
FCP244ms

Our Verdict

Liquid Web wins with 44ms TTFB (vs Codero's 643ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCoderoLiquid WebWinner
DNS Lookup95ms42msLiquid Web
TCP Connection19ms5msLiquid Web
TLS Handshake22ms13msLiquid Web
Server Processing185ms83msLiquid Web
Total TTFB321ms143msLiquid Web

Technology & Security Features

Codero

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size243.9 KB

Liquid Web

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.3 KB
3/3
Codero Security Features
2/3
Liquid Web Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.