GitHub|Since 2007

USCologixvsEdgeConneXUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner661 ms
Rank#15
TTFB44ms
Time to 1MB122ms
Score661
LCP444ms
FCP244ms
WPTR Score5334 ms
Rank#824
TTFB825ms
Time to 1MB1968ms
Score5334
LCP1225ms
FCP1025ms

Our Verdict

Cologix wins with 44ms TTFB (vs EdgeConneX's 825ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCologixEdgeConneXWinner
DNS Lookup4ms101msCologix
TCP Connection276ms8msEdgeConneX
TLS Handshake47ms13msEdgeConneX
Server Processing41ms489msCologix
Total TTFB368ms611msCologix

Technology & Security Features

Cologix

Server/CDNSucuri/Cloudproxy
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size490.7 KB

EdgeConneX

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size204.7 KB
3/3
Cologix Security Features
3/3
EdgeConneX Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.